{"id":185,"date":"2016-12-02T15:49:23","date_gmt":"2016-12-02T06:49:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/?p=185"},"modified":"2017-03-06T18:55:45","modified_gmt":"2017-03-06T09:55:45","slug":"%e3%83%97%e3%83%ad%e3%82%b0%e3%83%a9%e3%83%a0%e8%91%97%e4%bd%9c%e7%89%a9%e3%81%ae%e4%ba%89%e7%82%b9%ef%bc%88%e3%81%9d%e3%81%ae%ef%bc%91%ef%bc%89","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/archives\/185","title":{"rendered":"Points of dispute of computer program works (Part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0I have widely and shallowly researched civil court\u2019s decisions (decisions of infringement suits) about computer program works, as a task of Copyright Committee of the Japanese Patent Attorneys Association where I\u2019m belonging.\u00a0 Here, I will show secondary results of the task in several times. \u00a0Primary results of the task will be shown by the Japanese Patent Attorneys Association.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 In this entry, I will show a result of a keywords analysis of the decisions about the computer program works.<\/span>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Method of the analysis was comprised of a first step and a second step.\u00a0 In the first step, plain text files of resent 80 decisions were prepared.\u00a0 In the second step, I searched the keywords on the plain text files.\u00a0 The second step was performed by using a personal computer (executing program with grep command-line).\u00a0 The second step finished in a moment.\u00a0 The performance of the personal computer is surprisingly high!<\/span><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The result (a part of the result) of the analysis is shown in a table below.\u00a0 Numeric in each cell shows number of keywords included in each of the decisions.\u00a0 Each cell whose numeric is not less than 10, is marked with red.\u00a0 The highest number was reached up to 160.\u00a0 It can be understood that the highest number was appeared in \u201ccreativity\u201d and the second highest number was appeared in \u201csimilarity\u201d.\u00a0 Further, I calculated a coefficient of correlation between the number of \u201ccreativity\u201d and the number of \u201csimilarity\u201d.\u00a0 The number of \u201ccreativity\u201d and the number of \u201csimilarity\u201d were strongly correlated because the coefficient of correlation reached to 0.87.<\/span>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 According to the results, it can be said that:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the possibility that \u201ccreativity\u201d and \u201csimilarity\u201d will become a point of dispute is high,<\/li>\n<li><span>the possibility that a combination of \u201ccreativity\u201d and \u201csimilarity\u201d will become the point of dispute is high,<br \/>\n <\/span><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 in the infringement suits about the computer program works.<\/span><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Now, I am about to close this entry.\u00a0 And I will get further into contents of the decisions with focusing \u201ccreativity\u201d, in the next entry.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/hanreien.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"749\" height=\"796\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-523\" srcset=\"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/hanreien.png 749w, https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/hanreien-282x300.png 282w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 749px) 100vw, 749px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0I have widely and shallowly researched civil court\u2019s decisions (decisions of infringement suits) about computer program works, as a task of Copyright Committee of the Japanese Patent Attorneys Association where I\u2019m belonging.\u00a0 Here, I will show secondary results of the task in several times. \u00a0Primary results of the task will [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[17],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":598,"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions\/598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/knowledgepartners.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}